Nokia C5 5MP Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia C5 5MP vs. Nokia Asha 300
Nokia Asha 300
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches vs 4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C5 5MP vs. Nokia C5
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C5 5MP vs. Nokia C3 Touch and Type
Nokia C3 Touch and Type
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches vs 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C5 5MP vs. Nokia C2-01
Nokia C5 5MP
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C5 5MP vs. Nokia X3 Touch and Type
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C5 5MP vs. Nokia E5
Nokia C5 5MP
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia C5 5MP vs. Samsung Primo
Nokia C5 5MP
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
