Nokia C3 Touch and Type User Reviews
Overal user rating
The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.
Multimedia7.5/10Internet7.8/10Battery8.3/10Call quality9.2/10Display8.8/10Reception8.8/10Build quality9.8/10Text input9.2/10Everyday usage8.7/10UI speed8.2/10Camera8.8/10
Post new review
Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of Phone Arena.
posted on 10 Jul 2012, 11:47 (Posts: 0; Member since: 26 May 2012)
Not Bad for its price ..
ASARSAT has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
i'm using this mobile for 14 month . Not Bad for its price .. But touch is not very good i change it before .. screen is not scratch restaurant ...............................................................................Build quality 10/10Reception 8/10Call quality 10/10Internet 7/10Multimedia 7/10Camera 8/10UI speed 8/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 7/10Display 9/10Battery 10/10
- good cover ( stainless steel)
- long time battery
- screen is not scratch restaurant ..
- touch is not very good
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 19 Apr 2012, 06:44 (Posts: 0; Member since: 02 Apr 2012)
Touch screen crapped out and...
Leostaley has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
This phone was mostly good while i had it. My carrier allows mms, but this phone would not accept picture messages. I had to find a new phone when the touch screen started malfunctioning badly after about 6 months. it always showed signs every once in a while of this issue, but then one day the touch screen registered only one in 15 touches, and when it did, most of the time not where you touched.
The phone was of great build quality and size.
Reception was poorer than my verizon phone, but that's because of carrier.
No complaints about call quality. But the screen blacks out and locks annoyingly fast on calls, so it's hard to see your call time, or press numbers for automated systems etc. Also annoying, it doesn't begin logging the call time until your call has been answered, so you can't see how long it has been ringing.
There wasn't much room on the phone for downloading programs, but I was able to download opera, which was an infinitely superior browser, and put it on the shortcuts on the front page. The phone was TERRIBLY slow, even if you were connected to a fast WIFI- I could never tell a difference between the WIFI and T-Mobile.
Media was a mixed bag. I was grateful for the 3.5 headset jack, now one of my required features. Music player was functional when you got to your files. The hard part was getting to them.The media player was pretty bad at arranging files. if you have a lot of files, you have to scroll all the way through your albums or artist names; there...Build quality 10/10Reception 8/10Call quality 8/10Internet 6/10Multimedia 4/10Camera 8/10UI speed 6/10Everyday usage 4/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 9/10
- great keyboard
- great battery
- great build
- (barely) usable music player.
- Buggy UI
- VERY Poor Media Organization
- Such a Buggy UI that it became unusable
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 09 Nov 2011, 17:41 (Posts: 0; Member since: 05 Sep 2011)
nokia us quolity
Fuifui has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review
this is nokia with touch screen, it's innovative , but c5 has dual flash and better battery .but c301 is better than x302 which has no flash , but has navigation instead . so all in all buy this one if you are not stupid enough to own a smart phone , but still prefere interesting solutions .Build quality 10/10Reception 9/10Call quality 9/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 9/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 9/10Battery 7/10
- Very good build quility
- sleek +stainless steel+good size
- very nice +practical 2.4 touch screen
- 5mp camera , nice one
- all apps are good
- reasonable price
- average battery
- no micro sd and usb cable added
- no navigation
- single flash ,
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 09 Apr 2011, 11:14 (Posts: 0; Member since: 06 Apr 2011)
A gud mobi in budget with all features nd its sleek also..!!
sravan242 has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
This mobi is a nice one, its sleek, 3g n wifi powered, and good camera, its having 5mp with led flash, nice design toooo.. this one is perfect for who dream abt havin a touch mobile and wantd a lot chattin. and its also havin a good reception. gud body build with metal.Build quality 10/10Reception 9/10Call quality 9/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 9/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 9/10Battery 8/10
- nokia touch
- 3g, wifi
- its sleek
- small touch screen 2.4' bt gud
- slghtly battry
6 out of 7 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 10 Aug 2011, 10:46
its very gud mobile
arbaz has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
its very gud affordable and have very nice apps wifi isvery gud and gud metal body andis gud touch ..............................:) camera is also gud with flash and ui speed is also gud. call quality also very gud. its build quality is gud....... i will suggest u all to buy this one. :)Build quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 10/10
2 out of 4 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 25 Apr 2011, 12:44
Average phone not symbian...:(
Max has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review
its an average phone overall.but if ur budget is tight thn i prefr ths phone to u,but if u are looking for smart phone for business and good battery timing the plz dont waste your money on this....It is quiet sluggish sometimes.... although its bulit quality is nice but it is still not the best choice ...i suggest you to go for nokia e5 rather than this phone...it is sleek and stylish but i has alot of problems.....
Thank you :)
Build quality 9/10Reception 9/10Call quality 9/10Internet 7/10Multimedia 6/10Camera 9/10UI speed 7/10Everyday usage 8/10Text input 8/10Display 6/10Battery 6/10
- Build Quality
- Nice Camera
- Metallic Body
- Poor Battery
- Difficult to get used to
- touch screen is nt perfect in performance
- hangs alot
- poor browser
- poor multimedia functionailty
- average sound quality
3 out of 5 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report