Nokia C2-05 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia C2-05 vs. Nokia C2-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C2-05 vs. Nokia C2-02
Nokia C2-02
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C2-05 vs. Nokia C2-03
Nokia C2-03
- Dual SIM card support
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C2-05 vs. Nokia C1-01
Nokia C2-05
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C2-05 vs. Nokia Asha 300
Nokia C2-05
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
Nokia Asha 300
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C2-05 vs. Nokia C2-06
Nokia C2-06
- Dual SIM card support
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia C2-05 vs. Nokia C5-06
Nokia C2-05
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Nokia C5-06
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
