x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia Asha 502 Nokia Asha 502


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches vs 3.92 x 2.34 x 0.44 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Lumia 520 Nokia Lumia 520


  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (133 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Nokia Asha 210 Nokia Asha 210


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (133 ppi vs 169 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia Asha 500 Nokia Asha 500


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches vs 4.04 x 2.38 x 0.45 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (133 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches vs 4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories