Nokia Asha 306 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia Asha 306 vs. Nokia Asha 311
Nokia Asha 306
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 306 vs. Nokia Asha 305
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 306 vs. Nokia Asha 308
Nokia Asha 306
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 306 vs. Nokia Asha 309
Nokia Asha 306
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 306 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Nokia Asha 306
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung Galaxy Y
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 306 vs. Nokia Asha 303
Nokia Asha 306
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 306 vs. Samsung Galaxy Pocket
Nokia Asha 306
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
