Nokia Asha 300 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia Asha 300 vs. Nokia Asha 302
Nokia Asha 300
- Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 300 vs. Nokia Asha 303
Nokia Asha 300
- Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 300 vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Nokia Asha 300
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 300 vs. Nokia C3 Touch and Type
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 300 vs. Nokia X3 Touch and Type
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 300 vs. Nokia Asha 311
Nokia Asha 300
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 300 vs. Nokia C2-01
Nokia Asha 300
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Small dimensions (4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
