Nokia Asha 202 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia Asha 202 vs. Nokia Asha 203
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 202 vs. Nokia X2-02
Nokia Asha 202
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 202 vs. Nokia Asha 200
Nokia Asha 202
- Dual SIM card support
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 202 vs. Nokia 112
Nokia Asha 202
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 202 vs. Nokia 110
Nokia Asha 202
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 202 vs. Nokia Asha 300
Nokia Asha 202
- Dual SIM card support
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia Asha 202 vs. Nokia 206
Nokia Asha 202
- Dual SIM card support
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
