x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia Asha 200 Nokia Asha 200


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Nokia C3 Nokia C3


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 200 Nokia Asha 200


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Nokia Asha 210 Nokia Asha 210


  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 200 Nokia Asha 200


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Nokia Asha 302 Nokia Asha 302


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 200 Nokia Asha 200


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Microsoft Lumia 435 Microsoft Lumia 435


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Nokia Asha 200 Nokia Asha 200


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia Lumia 520 Nokia Lumia 520


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 235 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories