Nokia Arrow Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia Arrow vs. Nokia Phi
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia Arrow vs. Nokia Atlas
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia Arrow vs. HTC Windows Phone 8S
Nokia Arrow
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia Arrow vs. Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia Arrow
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Lumia 920
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.5 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (332 ppi)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8.7 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
Nokia Arrow vs. Nokia Asha 308
Nokia Arrow
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Asha 308
- Dual SIM card support
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
in-depth comparison
Nokia Arrow vs. Nokia Lumia 820
Nokia Arrow
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Lumia 820
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia Arrow vs. AT&T Fusion 2
Nokia Arrow
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
AT&T Fusion 2
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison

