Nokia 8800 Gold Arte Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 8800 Gold Arte the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 8800 Gold Arte compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte vs Nokia 8800 Arte
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte vs Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte vs Nokia 6700 classic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 6700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte vs Nokia 6730 classic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.50 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6730 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte vs Nokia 3600 slide
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 3.85 x 1.85 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 3600 slide-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte vs Nokia 7900 Prism
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.40 x 1.77 x 0.44 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 7900 Prism-specific Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte vs Motorola ATRIX 2
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Motorola ATRIX 2-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (256 ppi)
- Big screen (4.30 inches)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte vs Nokia 1006
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.25 x 1.73 x 0.53 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 1006-specific Pros & Cons
none
