x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte


  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte


  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.21 x 1.77 x 0.59 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Nokia C3 Touch and Type Nokia C3 Touch and Type


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories