Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte vs Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 208 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte vs Nokia 8800 Gold Arte
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte vs Nokia 8800 Arte
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte vs LG Mini
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.02 x 1.86 x 0.39 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG Mini-specific Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte vs Nokia 2710 Navigation Edition
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.38 x 1.80 x 0.54 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 2710 Navigation Edition-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte vs Nokia Oro
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Oro-specific Pros & Cons
- Global phone that can work on any GSM/UMTS network in the world
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow processor (680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte vs Nokia 6700 classic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 6700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte vs Nokia C5
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C5-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
