Nokia 8800 Arte Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 8800 Arte the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 8800 Arte compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 8800 Arte vs Nokia Oro
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Oro-specific Pros & Cons
- Global phone that can work on any GSM/UMTS network in the world
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow processor (680 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 8800 Arte vs Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 208 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia 8800 Arte vs Nokia 8800 Gold Arte
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Gold Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Arte vs Nokia N96
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia N96-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (264 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Nokia 8800 Arte vs Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 8800 Arte vs Nokia 3555
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 3555-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.81 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 8800 Arte vs Nokia N95 8GB US
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia N95 8GB US-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Nokia 8800 Arte vs Nokia 2135
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 96 x 65 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 8800 Arte-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 2135-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
