Nokia 7510 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 7510 vs. BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220
Nokia 7510
- Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.69 inches inches)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7510 vs. Samsung SGH-T336
Samsung SGH-T336
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.78 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7510 vs. Nokia 7705 Twist
Nokia 7510
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches inches vs 2.71 x 2.71 x 0.59 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7510 vs. Nokia X5-01 American version
Nokia 7510
- Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia X5-01 American version
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (169 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7510 vs. HTC Sensation 4G
Nokia 7510
- Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC Sensation 4G
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (256 ppi)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia 7510 vs. HTC Amaze 4G
Nokia 7510
- Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC Amaze 4G
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (256 ppi)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison

