x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 7510 Supernova Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 7510 Supernova Nokia 7510 Supernova


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)

Nokia 6600 fold Nokia 6600 fold


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (188 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches vs 3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7510 Supernova Nokia 7510 Supernova


  • Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches)

LG KF300 LG KF300


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 0.64 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7510 Supernova Nokia 7510 Supernova


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 3710 fold Nokia 3710 fold


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches vs 3.50 x 1.85 x 0.60 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7510 Supernova Nokia 7510 Supernova


  • Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches vs 1.04 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7510 Supernova Nokia 7510 Supernova


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)

Nokia 7230 Nokia 7230


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches vs 3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7510 Supernova Nokia 7510 Supernova


  • Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Samsung C3520 Samsung C3520


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7510 Supernova Nokia 7510 Supernova


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Apple iPhone 5c Apple iPhone 5c


  • High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (1016 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches vs 4.90 x 2.33 x 0.35 inches)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories