x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 4.88 x 2.19 x 0.41 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 Nokia 7230


  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)

Nokia C2-05 Nokia C2-05


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 Nokia 7230


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 3.66 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 Nokia 7230


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia 6700 slide Nokia 6700 slide


  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 Nokia 7230


  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 Nokia 7230


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 3.54 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 Nokia 7230


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories