Nokia 7230 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 7230 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 7230 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 7230 vs Nokia C2-02
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia C2-02-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (32 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia 7230 vs Nokia C3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Nokia C3-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
Nokia 7230 vs Nokia Asha 300
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
Nokia Asha 300-specific Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Nokia 7230 vs Motorola MOTO Z9
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Motorola MOTO Z9-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 7230 vs Motorola MOTO W233 Renew
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 113 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Motorola MOTO W233 Renew-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 7230 vs Nokia C2-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Nokia C2-01-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
Nokia 7230 vs Samsung C3750
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung C3750-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 7230 vs Nokia 6600i slide
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 3.66 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 6600i slide-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
