Nokia 7230 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 7230 vs. Nokia C2-02
Nokia C2-02
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 vs. Nokia C2-05
Nokia C2-05
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 vs. Nokia Asha 311
Nokia 7230
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Asha 311
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 vs. Nokia C2-01
Nokia C2-01
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 vs. Nokia Asha 300
Nokia Asha 300
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches vs 4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 vs. Nokia 6700 slide US
Nokia 7230
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6700 slide US
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches vs 3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 vs. Nokia C2-06
Nokia C2-06
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
