Nokia 7230 US Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 7230 US vs. Nokia 7230
Nokia 7230 US
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 US vs. LG GU295
Nokia 7230 US
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GU295
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 US vs. Samsung Galaxy S 4G
Nokia 7230 US
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 US vs. HTC Sensation 4G
Nokia 7230 US
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC Sensation 4G
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (256 ppi)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 US vs. Nokia Asha 311
Nokia 7230 US
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 US vs. LG A340
Nokia 7230 US
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG A340
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 7230 US vs. Samsung E2600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
