x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 7230 US Nokia 7230 US


  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)

Nokia C2-05 Nokia C2-05


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 US Nokia 7230 US


  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Samsung GALAXY Star Samsung GALAXY Star


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia X3 Nokia X3


none

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 3.78 x 1.94 x 0.56 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 US Nokia 7230 US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 2220 slide Nokia 2220 slide


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 3.82 x 1.85 x 0.62 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 US Nokia 7230 US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Apple iPhone 4s Apple iPhone 4s


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 7230 US Nokia 7230 US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Sony Ericsson W995 Sony Ericsson W995


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 3.82 x 1.93 x 0.59 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories