Nokia 7230 US Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 7230 US the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 7230 US compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 7230 US vs Nokia C5-03
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
Nokia C5-03-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia 7230 US vs Nokia X3 Touch and Type
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
Nokia X3 Touch and Type-specific Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia 7230 US vs Nokia C2-05
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia C2-05-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
Nokia 7230 US vs Samsung Monte Slider
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches vs 3.88 x 1.91 x 0.56 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 100 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 120 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung Monte Slider-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 7230 US vs Sony Ericsson Cedar
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
Sony Ericsson Cedar-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 7230 US vs Nokia 7230
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230 US-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 7230-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 7230 US vs Nokia C3-01.5
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia C3-01.5-specific Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia 7230 US vs Samsung C6112
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 7230 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung C6112-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
