x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 6790 Surge Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 6760 slide Nokia 6760 slide


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6790 Surge Nokia 6790 Surge


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 5730 XpressMusic Nokia 5730 XpressMusic


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6790 Surge Nokia 6790 Surge


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Samsung Galaxy Discover Samsung Galaxy Discover


  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6790 Surge Nokia 6790 Surge


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia N97 mini Nokia N97 mini


  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6790 Surge Nokia 6790 Surge


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Samsung Galaxy Centura Samsung Galaxy Centura


  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6790 Surge Nokia 6790 Surge


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Mural Nokia Mural


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6790 Surge Nokia 6790 Surge


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 6210 Navigator Nokia 6210 Navigator


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories