x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 6720 classic US Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor

Nokia X3 Touch and Type Nokia X3 Touch and Type


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Nokia 6700 classic Nokia 6700 classic


  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Nokia 6208 classic Nokia 6208 classic


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 4.32 x 1.94 x 0.52 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia Lumia 822 Nokia Lumia 822


  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Dual core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • NFC

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 217 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor

Nokia C3 Touch and Type Nokia C3 Touch and Type


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Nokia 301 Nokia 301


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories