x PhoneArena is looking for new authors in New York! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 6720 classic US Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor

Nokia X3 Touch and Type Nokia X3 Touch and Type


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Nokia 6700 classic Nokia 6700 classic


  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 6555 Nokia 6555


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Nokia 6600 fold Nokia 6600 fold


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Nokia 6303 classic Nokia 6303 classic


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 4.28 x 1.82 x 0.46 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6720 classic US Nokia 6720 classic US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Nokia E73 Mode Nokia E73 Mode


  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches vs 4.48 x 2.30 x 0.40 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories