Nokia 6700 slide Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6700 slide vs. Nokia 6500 slide
Nokia 6700 slide
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 6500 slide
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide vs. Nokia N96
Nokia 6700 slide
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia N96
- Slow processor (264 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide vs. Nokia 6600i slide
Nokia 6700 slide
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches vs 3.66 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide vs. Nokia X3 Touch and Type
Nokia 6700 slide
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide vs. Nokia 6220 classic
Nokia 6700 slide
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 6220 classic
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide vs. Nokia N86 8MP
Nokia 6700 slide
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia N86 8MP
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (75 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Nokia C5 5MP
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
