Nokia 6700 slide US Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6700 slide US vs. Nokia 6700 classic
Nokia 6700 slide US
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide US vs. Nokia 6710 Navigator
Nokia 6700 slide US
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide US vs. Nokia 7230
Nokia 6700 slide US
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 7230
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches vs 3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide US vs. Nokia 6700 slide
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide US vs. Nokia X3 Touch and Type
Nokia 6700 slide US
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia X3 Touch and Type
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide US vs. Nokia Asha 300
Nokia 6700 slide US
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Asha 300
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches vs 4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6700 slide US vs. Sony Ericsson Hazel
Nokia 6700 slide US
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Sony Ericsson Hazel
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
