x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 6700 slide US Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 6700 slide US Nokia 6700 slide US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 6700 classic Nokia 6700 classic


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6700 slide US Nokia 6700 slide US


  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6700 slide US Nokia 6700 slide US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 7230 Nokia 7230


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches vs 3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6700 slide US Nokia 6700 slide US


  • Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 188 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6700 slide US Nokia 6700 slide US


  • Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia C2-02 Nokia C2-02


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6700 slide US Nokia 6700 slide US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia X3 Touch and Type Nokia X3 Touch and Type


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6700 slide US Nokia 6700 slide US


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches vs 4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories