Nokia 6682 / 6681 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6682 / 6681 vs. Nokia 6680
Nokia 6682 / 6681
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.81 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6682 / 6681 vs. Nokia 6630
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.81 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6682 / 6681 vs. Nokia N72
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6682 / 6681 vs. Nokia 6600
Nokia 6682 / 6681
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.93 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6682 / 6681 vs. Nokia N81 8GB
Nokia 6682 / 6681
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
Nokia N81 8GB
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6682 / 6681 vs. Nokia N82
Nokia 6682 / 6681
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia N82
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6682 / 6681 vs. Nokia X6 8GB
Nokia 6682 / 6681
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia X6 8GB
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
