x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 6650 Nokia 6650


  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 6267 Nokia 6267


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6650 Nokia 6650


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Mural Nokia Mural


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6650 Nokia 6650


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 6600 fold Nokia 6600 fold


  • Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 188 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6650 Nokia 6650


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia E72 Nokia E72


  • Full hardware keyboard for text input
  • Small dimensions (4.49 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6650 Nokia 6650


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 6350 Nokia 6350


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6650 Nokia 6650


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Motorola Renegade V950 Motorola Renegade V950


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6650 Nokia 6650


  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 6131 Nokia 6131


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories