Nokia 6600 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6600 vs. Nokia 6630
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.93 inches inches vs 0.81 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6600 vs. Nokia N70
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.93 inches inches vs 0.89 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6600 vs. Nokia 6638
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.93 inches inches vs 0.90 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6600 vs. Nokia N72
Nokia N72
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.93 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6600 vs. Nokia 6620
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.93 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6600 vs. Nokia 7610 / 7610B
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.93 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1 megapixel)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6600 vs. Nokia 6680
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.93 inches inches vs 0.81 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
