Nokia 6600 fold Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 6600 fold the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 6600 fold compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6600 fold vs Nokia 3710 fold
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches vs 3.50 x 1.85 x 0.60 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6600 fold-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 3710 fold-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 6600 fold vs Samsung SGH-F210
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches vs 3.46 x 1.22 x 0.82 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6600 fold-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung SGH-F210-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches)
Nokia 6600 fold vs Pantech PG-C3b
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches vs 2.71 x 1.69 x 0.79 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6600 fold-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Pantech PG-C3b-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (119 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 6600 fold vs Sony Ericsson Z320
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6600 fold-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson Z320-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 6600 fold vs Nokia 6600 slide
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches vs 3.54 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6600 fold-specific Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 6600 slide-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 6600 fold vs Nokia 3710 fold US
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches vs 3.50 x 1.85 x 0.60 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6600 fold-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 3710 fold US-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 6600 fold vs Samsung SGH-X520
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches vs 3.50 x 1.65 x 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6600 fold-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung SGH-X520-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (108 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 6600 fold vs Samsung SGH-F200
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches vs 3.54 x 1.29 x 0.78 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6600 fold-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung SGH-F200-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (174 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches)
