Nokia 6555 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 6555 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 6555 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6555 vs Nokia 7900 Prism
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6555-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches)
Nokia 7900 Prism-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.40 x 1.77 x 0.44 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 6555 vs Nokia N95 8GB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches vs 0.82 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6555-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia N95 8GB-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Bulky
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Nokia 6555 vs Nokia 6350
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches vs 0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6555-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 6350-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 6555 vs Samsung SGH-A706
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA 1.8 Mbit/s)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches vs 0.69 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6555-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Samsung SGH-A706-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 6555 vs Nokia N95 US
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches vs 0.82 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6555-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia N95 US-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Bulky
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Nokia 6555 vs Apple iPhone 4S
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneNokia 6555-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 4S-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.37 inches)
- Dual-mode CDMA/GSM phone
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (330 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia 6555 vs Sharp FX Plus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 6555-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sharp FX Plus-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
Nokia 6555 vs Motorola GLEAM
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6555-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Motorola GLEAM-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
