Nokia 6350 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 6350 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 6350 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6350 vs AT&T Z331
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6350 vs Motorola Tundra VA76r
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.94 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6350 vs LG GU295
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6350 vs AT&T Z221
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.73 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6350 vs Pantech Breeze III
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6350 vs AT&T F160
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6350-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 6350 vs Samsung SGH-A777
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6350-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 6350 vs Pantech Link II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6350-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture





