Nokia 6290 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6290 vs. Nokia 6267
Nokia 6290
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches vs 0.84 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6290 vs. Nokia 7020
Nokia 6290
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6290 vs. Nokia 6260 slide
Nokia 6290
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6290 vs. HTC One X
Nokia 6290
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HTC One X
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.7 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (312 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia 6290 vs. Nokia 6600i slide
Nokia 6290
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6290 vs. Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia 6290
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Lumia 920
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.5 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (332 ppi)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8.7 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia 6290 vs. HTC One X+
Nokia 6290
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HTC One X+
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.7 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (312 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1700 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison

