x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 6267 Nokia 6267


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches)

Nokia 6600 fold Nokia 6600 fold


  • Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (188 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6267 Nokia 6267


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 6131 NFC Nokia 6131 NFC


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches vs 0.78 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6267 Nokia 6267


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6267 Nokia 6267


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches)

Nokia 6650 Nokia 6650


  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6267 Nokia 6267


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 3710 fold Nokia 3710 fold


  • Small dimensions (3.50 x 1.85 x 0.60 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6267 Nokia 6267


  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 6131 Nokia 6131


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches vs 0.78 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6267 Nokia 6267


  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 6263 Nokia 6263


  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches vs 0.85 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories