Nokia 6267 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6267 vs. Nokia Mural
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches vs 0.64 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6267 vs. Nokia 6263
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches vs 0.85 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6267 vs. Nokia 6600 fold
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6267 vs. Nokia 7020
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6267 vs. Nokia 3710 fold
Nokia 6267
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6267 vs. Nokia 6650
Nokia 6267
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches)
Nokia 6650
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6267 vs. Nokia 6290
Nokia 6290
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.84 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
