Nokia 6265i Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6265i vs. Nokia N95 8GB
Nokia 6265i
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia N95 8GB
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.87 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6265i vs. ZTE Engage
Nokia 6265i
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.87 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
ZTE Engage
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia 6265i vs. PCD CDM-8920 / PM-8920
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.87 inches inches vs 0.90 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6265i vs. Nokia 6288
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.87 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6265i vs. Motorola Evoke QA4
Nokia 6265i
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Motorola Evoke QA4
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.87 inches inches vs 0.69 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6265i vs. Apple iPhone 3GS
Nokia 6265i
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.87 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 3GS
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6265i vs. PCD CDM-8900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.87 inches inches vs 0.75 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
