Nokia 6220 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6220 vs. Nokia 6100
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.75 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 vs. Nokia 5630 XpressMusic
Nokia 6220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.75 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 5630 XpressMusic
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 vs. Nokia 3110 Classic
Nokia 6220
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.75 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 vs. Nokia 100
Nokia 6220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.75 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 vs. Nokia 6230
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.75 inches inches vs 0.79 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 vs. Nokia 6300
Nokia 6220
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.75 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 vs. Nokia E66
Nokia 6220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.75 inches inches)
Nokia E66
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
