Nokia 6220 classic Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6220 classic vs. Nokia 6210 Navigator
Nokia 6220 classic
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 classic vs. Nokia 6120 classic
Nokia 6120 classic
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 classic vs. Nokia 6720 classic
Nokia 6220 classic
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 classic vs. Nokia 6700 slide
Nokia 6220 classic
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6700 slide
- Small dimensions (3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 classic vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Nokia 6220 classic
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 classic vs. Nokia 5320 XpressMusic
Nokia 6220 classic
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 6220 classic vs. Nokia C5
Nokia 6220 classic
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C5
- Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
