Nokia 6205 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 6205 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 6205 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 6205 vs Nokia 7510 Supernova
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6205 vs Nokia 2605 Mirage
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6205 vs Nokia 7610 Supernova
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6205-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches)
Nokia 6205 vs Samsung SCH-U430
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6205 vs Motorola MOTO W755
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 148 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6205 vs Motorola Rapture VU30
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6205 vs Motorola VU204
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 157 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.76 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 6205 vs Microsoft KIN ONE
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.73 inches)
Nokia 6205-specific Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment





