x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 6131 Nokia 6131


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia 2720 fold Nokia 2720 fold


  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6131 Nokia 6131


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia 6600 fold Nokia 6600 fold


  • Small dimensions (3.45 x 1.73 x 0.62 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
  • Low pixel density screen (188 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6131 Nokia 6131


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6131 Nokia 6131


  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia 2760 Nokia 2760


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6131 Nokia 6131


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia 6555 Nokia 6555


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.77 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 6131 Nokia 6131


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Nokia 6267 Nokia 6267


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.84 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.73 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories