Nokia 5700 XpressMusic Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic vs. Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic vs. Nokia N70
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches vs 0.89 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic vs. Nokia N73
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic vs. Nokia N82
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 332 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic vs. Nokia 2700 classic
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic vs. Sony Xperia sola
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Sony Xperia sola
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (265 ppi)
- Dual core processor
- NFC
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 2.32 x 0.39 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic vs. Nokia N81
Nokia 5700 XpressMusic
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
