x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 5630 XpressMusic Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 5630 XpressMusic Nokia 5630 XpressMusic


  • Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5630 XpressMusic Nokia 5630 XpressMusic


  • Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5630 XpressMusic Nokia 5630 XpressMusic


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 5310 XpressMusic Nokia 5310 XpressMusic


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.08 x 1.75 x 0.38 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5630 XpressMusic Nokia 5630 XpressMusic


  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia C5 5MP Nokia C5 5MP


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5630 XpressMusic Nokia 5630 XpressMusic


  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5630 XpressMusic Nokia 5630 XpressMusic


  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia C5 Nokia C5


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5630 XpressMusic Nokia 5630 XpressMusic


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 515 Nokia 515


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches vs 4.49 x 1.89 x 0.43 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (182 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories