Nokia 5530 XpressMusic Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic vs. Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (253 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic vs. Nokia 500
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (253 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic vs. Sony Xperia U
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (253 ppi vs 280 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic vs. Nokia Asha 311
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (253 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Asha 311
- Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.51 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic vs. Nokia Lumia 620
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (253 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (253 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Galaxy Y
- Low pixel density screen (133 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.51 inches inches vs 4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic vs. Nokia Asha 306
Nokia 5530 XpressMusic
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (253 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Asha 306
- Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
