Nokia 5320 XpressMusic Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic vs. Nokia 5310 XpressMusic
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 5310 XpressMusic
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 1.75 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic vs. Nokia 5630 XpressMusic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic vs. Nokia 6210 Navigator
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 6210 Navigator
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic vs. Nokia 5130 XpressMusic
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic vs. Nokia E51
Nokia E51
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic vs. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 5220 XpressMusic
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.71 x 0.41 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5320 XpressMusic vs. Nokia C5 5MP
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
