Nokia 5250 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 5250 vs. Nokia 500
Nokia 5250
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (262 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5250 vs. Nokia 5228
Nokia 5250
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (262 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5250 vs. Nokia Asha 311
Nokia 5250
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (262 ppi)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5250 vs. Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
Nokia 5250
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (262 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5250 vs. Nokia Asha 300
Nokia 5250
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (262 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches inches vs 4.44 x 1.95 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5250 vs. Nokia 5230
Nokia 5250
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (262 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5250 vs. Nokia C5-03
Nokia 5250
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (262 ppi)
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (434 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
