x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola Moto G (2015) Motorola Moto G (2015)


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Water-resistant phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches vs 3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia Lumia 1520 Nokia Lumia 1520


  • Big display (6.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (368 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (20 megapixels)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy S II Samsung Galaxy S II


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches vs 4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 218 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 6500 slide Nokia 6500 slide


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories