x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Microsoft Lumia 435 Microsoft Lumia 435


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches vs 3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola Moto G (2015) Motorola Moto G (2015)


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 294 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia 1800 Nokia 1800


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories