x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Microsoft Lumia 435 Microsoft Lumia 435


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 1 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Xiaomi Mi 5 Xiaomi Mi 5


  • Lightweight phone
  • High screen-to-body ratio (73.23 %)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Dual SIM card support
  • Lots of RAM (4 GB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.29 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia Lumia 625 Nokia Lumia 625


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 201 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories