x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia Lumia 520 Nokia Lumia 520


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 235 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia Lumia 625 Nokia Lumia 625


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 201 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia XL Nokia XL


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 187 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 768 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Nokia Lumia 630 Nokia Lumia 630


  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 218 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5250 Nokia 5250


  • Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola Moto E Motorola Moto E


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (262 ppi vs 256 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories