Nokia 5200 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 5200 vs. Nokia 5300 XpressMusic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.81 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5200 vs. Nokia 5310 XpressMusic
Nokia 5200
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.81 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 5310 XpressMusic
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 1.75 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5200 vs. Nokia Lumia 620
Nokia 5200
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.81 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia 5200 vs. Nokia 3500 classic
Nokia 5200
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.81 inches inches)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia 3500 classic
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 1.77 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5200 vs. Nokia 6760 slide
Nokia 5200
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.81 inches inches)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia 6760 slide
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5200 vs. Nokia N-Gage QD
Nokia 5200
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia N-Gage QD
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- No rear camera
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.81 inches inches vs 0.87 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 5200 vs. Nokia Lumia 720
Nokia 5200
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.81 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Lumia 720
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
