x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 500 Nokia 500


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia Lumia 520 Nokia Lumia 520


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 235 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 500 Nokia 500


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 700 Nokia 700


  • Small dimensions (4.33 x 1.97 x 0.38 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 500 Nokia 500


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 501 Nokia Asha 501


  • Small dimensions (3.91 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 500 Nokia 500


  • The camera lacks autofocus

Nokia Lumia 510 Nokia Lumia 510


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Nokia 500 Nokia 500


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 311 Nokia Asha 311


  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 500 Nokia 500


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 503 Nokia Asha 503


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 133 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 500 Nokia 500


  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia N8 Nokia N8


  • Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (229 ppi vs 210 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (360 x 640 pixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories