x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 5000 Nokia 5000


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches vs 4.08 x 1.75 x 0.38 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5000 Nokia 5000


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches vs 4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5000 Nokia 5000


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Nokia X3 Touch and Type Nokia X3 Touch and Type


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5000 Nokia 5000


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Nokia E52 Nokia E52


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5000 Nokia 5000


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5000 Nokia 5000


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016) Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016)


  • High pixel density screen (312 ppi)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.29 inches)
  • Too little RAM memory (1536 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches vs 5.30 x 2.57 x 0.29 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 312 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Nokia 5000 Nokia 5000


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia C5 Nokia C5


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.17 x 1.81 x 0.43 inches vs 4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories