Nokia 3660 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 3660 vs. Nokia 3650
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.00 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3660 vs. Nokia 6600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.00 inches inches vs 0.93 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3660 vs. Nokia 6620
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.00 inches inches vs 0.93 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3660 vs. Nokia 6630
Nokia 6630
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.00 inches inches vs 0.81 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3660 vs. Nokia E51
Nokia E51
- Small dimensions (4.51 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3660 vs. Samsung Galaxy S II
Nokia 3660
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.00 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Galaxy S II
- Dual core processor
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Small dimensions (4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison

