Nokia 3250 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 3250 vs. Nokia 3230
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.74 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3250 vs. Nokia N70
Nokia 3250
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.89 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3250 vs. Nokia 6680
Nokia 3250
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.81 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3250 vs. Nokia E75
Nokia 3250
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia E75
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3250 vs. Nokia E5
Nokia 3250
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia E5
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3250 vs. Nokia N91
Nokia 3250
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Nokia N91
- Slow processor (220 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches vs 0.86 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3250 vs. Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
Nokia 3250
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.78 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 208 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
