Nokia 3220 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 3220 vs. Apple iPhone 5
Nokia 3220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 5
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1016 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Small dimensions (4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches inches)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3220 vs. Sony Xperia S
Nokia 3220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Sony Xperia S
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (342 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3220 vs. Meizu MX2
Nokia 3220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Meizu MX2
- Quad core processor
- Big display (4.4 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (343 ppi)
- High-resolution display (800 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3220 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
Nokia 3220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S III
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia 3220 vs. Sony Ericsson K300
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches vs 0.76 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3220 vs. Nokia Lumia 710
Nokia 3220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Lumia 710
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3220 vs. Nokia Lumia 620
Nokia 3220
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
