x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia 3120 classic Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 3120 classic Nokia 3120 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)

Nokia 6120 classic Nokia 6120 classic


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 3120 classic Nokia 3120 classic


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 3100 / 3120 Nokia 3100 / 3120


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches vs 4.01 x 1.68 x 0.60 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 3120 classic Nokia 3120 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches)

Nokia C2-01 Nokia C2-01


  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 3120 classic Nokia 3120 classic


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 130 Nokia 130


  • No rear camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches vs 4.17 x 1.79 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 3120 classic Nokia 3120 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia 2730 classic Nokia 2730 classic


  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 3120 classic Nokia 3120 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low-resolution video capture

BlackBerry Curve 8520 BlackBerry Curve 8520


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE vs EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 152 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 3120 classic Nokia 3120 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Nokia 6220 classic Nokia 6220 classic


  • Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (200 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories