Nokia 3120 classic Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 3120 classic vs. Nokia 2700 classic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches inches vs 4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3120 classic vs. Nokia C2-01
Nokia 3120 classic
- Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C2-01
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3120 classic vs. Nokia 6120 classic
Nokia 3120 classic
- Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
Nokia 6120 classic
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3120 classic vs. Nokia Asha 311
Nokia 3120 classic
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Asha 311
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.05 x 0.51 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3120 classic vs. Nokia 6030
Nokia 3120 classic
- Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 6030
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3120 classic vs. Nokia 2610
Nokia 3120 classic
- Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 2610
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 3120 classic vs. Nokia X2-02
Nokia 3120 classic
- Small dimensions (4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia X2-02
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
