Nokia 2700 classic Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 2700 classic the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 2700 classic compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 2700 classic vs Nokia C2-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
Nokia C2-01-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
Nokia 2700 classic vs Nokia 2710 Navigation Edition
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches vs 4.38 x 1.80 x 0.54 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 2710 Navigation Edition-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
Nokia 2700 classic vs Nokia 2730 classic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Nokia 2730 classic-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 2700 classic vs LG A200
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG A200-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 2700 classic vs Nokia 3120 classic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches vs 4.38 x 1.78 x 0.52 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
none
Nokia 3120 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 2700 classic vs Samsung B7722
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Samsung B7722-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia 2700 classic vs Nokia N82
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia N82-specific Pros & Cons
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Slow processor (332 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Nokia 2700 classic vs Sony Ericsson W302
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches vs 3.94 x 1.81 x 0.41 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2700 classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
Sony Ericsson W302-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
