x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches vs 4.30 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2690 Nokia 2690


  • Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches)

Nokia C2-01 Nokia C2-01


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2690 Nokia 2690


  • Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2690 Nokia 2690


  • Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches)
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)

Nokia 220 Nokia 220


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 225 Nokia 225


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches vs 4.88 x 2.19 x 0.41 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2690 Nokia 2690


  • Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2690 Nokia 2690


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 6303i classic Nokia 6303i classic


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches vs 4.28 x 1.82 x 0.46 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi vs 182 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories