Nokia 2690 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Nokia 2690 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Nokia 2690 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 2690 vs Nokia C1-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2690 vs Samsung E2152
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches vs 4.39 x 1.80 x 0.53 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 102 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2690 vs Nokia 2680 slide
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches vs 3.89 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2690 vs Nokia 7020
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2690-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Nokia 2690 vs Nokia 7310 Supernova
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches vs 4.19 x 1.79 x 0.47 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2690 vs Nokia C2-01
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2690-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Nokia 2690 vs Nokia 1800
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2690-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Nokia 2690 vs Nokia C1-02
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.54 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia 2690-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus





