x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Nokia 2651 / 2650 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2651 / 2650 Nokia 2651 / 2650


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)

Nokia 2690 Nokia 2690


  • Small dimensions (4.23 x 1.79 x 0.54 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2651 / 2650 Nokia 2651 / 2650


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Samsung Galaxy Note 5


  • Big display (5.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (518 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (76.62 %)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Lots of RAM (4096 MB RAM)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2651 / 2650 Nokia 2651 / 2650


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Samsung GT-C3592 Samsung GT-C3592


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2651 / 2650 Nokia 2651 / 2650


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Motorola Moto X Style Motorola Moto X Style


  • Big display (5.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (520 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.03 %)
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Splash-proof phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2651 / 2650 Nokia 2651 / 2650


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.90 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories