x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.


Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches vs 4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2630 Nokia 2630


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 130 Nokia 130


  • No rear camera
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches vs 4.17 x 1.79 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2630 Nokia 2630


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia C1-01 Nokia C1-01


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2630 Nokia 2630


  • Small dimensions (4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 2600 Nokia 2600


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2630 Nokia 2630


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 105 Nokia 105


  • No rear camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches vs 4.21 x 1.76 x 0.56 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2630 Nokia 2630


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 2323 classic Nokia 2323 classic


  • No rear camera
  • Low pixel density screen (114 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches vs 4.21 x 1.81 x 0.54 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2630 Nokia 2630


  • Small dimensions (4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Sony Ericsson K750 Sony Ericsson K750


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.80 inches inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories