x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Nokia 2600 Nokia 2600


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)

Nokia 2600 classic Nokia 2600 classic


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 Nokia 2600


  • No rear camera
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)

Nokia 2630 Nokia 2630


  • Small dimensions (4.13 x 1.77 x 0.33 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Low resolution display (128 x 160 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 Nokia 2600


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Samsung Galaxy S4 mini Samsung Galaxy S4 mini


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (4.91 x 2.41 x 0.35 inches)
  • Low pixel density screen (256 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches vs 0.77 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 Nokia 2600


  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)

Nokia 7230 Nokia 7230


  • Small dimensions (3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Nokia 2600 Nokia 2600


  • No rear camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches vs 0.73 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories