Nokia 2600 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Nokia 2600 vs. Nokia 1600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 vs. Nokia 2600 classic
Nokia 2600
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
Nokia 2600 classic
- Small dimensions (4.31 x 1.83 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 vs. Nokia 110
Nokia 2600
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 110
- Dual SIM card support
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 vs. Nokia Lumia 800
Nokia 2600
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Nokia Lumia 800
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 vs. Motorola W375
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches vs 0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 vs. HTC One SV LTE
Nokia 2600
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HTC One SV LTE
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Nokia 2600 vs. Nokia 1110 / 1112
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.79 inches inches vs 0.67 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
